Research and analysis

Validating COVID-19 tests in the private market; RPC Opinion (Green-rated)

Regulatory Policy Committee opinion on DHSC's validating COVID-19 tests in the private market IA

Documents

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

皇冠体育app proposed regulation would make mandatory validation requirements for COVID-19 test devices for sale in the private market.

皇冠体育app Department first published an IA on 20 July 2021, on which the RPC issued and published an opinion which was rated as not fit for purpose based on the calculation of the equivalent annual net direct cost to business (EANDCB). 皇冠体育app first stage (desktop validation) of the measure was introduced in legislation on 28 July 2021. 皇冠体育app Department has now submitted the next iteration of the IA in anticipation of the passage of legislation to introduce the second stage (laboratory validation) of the measure.

皇冠体育app provides a clear rationale for intervention. It is well researched and draws upon a range of sources, such as consultations and commissioned research, to inform the assumptions used in the cost-benefit analysis. However, the IA may contextualise the analysis further by illustrating the acceptable levels for producing false results and how this compares to government-procured devices or other forms of available testing. 皇冠体育app IA apportions the impacts to non-UK businesses and correctly excludes these from the calculation of the equivalent annual net cost to business and net present value. 皇冠体育app IA could have provided more on any insights from the implementation of the first stage earlier in 2021

Updates to this page

Published 6 December 2021

Sign up for emails or print this page