Impact assessment

Impact Assessment for the amendment of Section 147 of the Equality Act 2010 鈥� Meaning of "qualifying compromise contract"

Differing interpretations of the meaning of Section 147 of the Equality Act 2010 have resulted in employers and employees being reluctant to鈥�

From:
Government Equalities Office
Published
13 February 2012
This was published under the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government

Documents

PDF, 365 KB, 15 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

Differing interpretations of the meaning of Section 147 of the Equality Act 2010 have resulted in employers and employees being reluctant to use compromise contracts as a means of settling discrimination disputes at work. 皇冠体育apprefore the government has decided to amend Section 147 to clarify its meaning.

皇冠体育app Equality Act 2010 (Amendment) Order 2012 (SI number 334) was laid before Parliament on 13 February with a coming into force date of 6th April 2012.聽聽 皇冠体育app amendment makes clear that a person in a discrimination dispute with their employer or former employer can seek the advice of their own lawyer before signing a compromise contract with the employer to settle the dispute. 皇冠体育app original wording of Section 147 achieved this, but the amendment makes the meaning clearer, and will restore confidence in using compromise contracts as an option for dispute resolution in the workplace.

This Impact Assessment considers the effect of the clarification.

Date: Mon Feb 13 15:57:32 GMT 2012

Full Document

Updates to this page

Published 13 February 2012

Sign up for emails or print this page